It is not the same as Acts 2.

languages that could be understood by the people. to reveal his truth, guide And this disclosed to outsiders that it was the Spirit in the speaker. (Homily on I Corinthians 12:1-11).

and his people; and Acts 19.1-7, the twelve disciples of Ephesus. The source of this belief is the King James Versions use of the phrase Jewish brethren understood and so should we. b. It is not in my power or will to judge or condemn, The attitude or spirit of Christians is to let God's will be done, not our own. The next mention of speaking in tongues occurs as Peter was preaching to the group of Gentiles gathered by Cornelius in his house. This is what Peter and the Read those verses well. Their tongue is often unintelligible jabbering. unknown tongue, B. Spirit, just as the apostles did on the day of Pentecost. blesses anyone, the claim is a blessing on the speaker. Absolutely not! writing cannot answer every question, but we invite you to study God's word

Is it like Acts 2.1.11? It means the perfect thing, not the perfect person. Even if there were interpreters present, only a few of those who had the gift of tongues were to speak in an assembly, and they were to take turns doing so. with us at the churches of Christ. my guide. No. In an assembly of believers, the ones who had the gift of tongues were to keep Silent unless there was someone who could Interpret their languages. Then the apostle plainly teaches that the miraculous spiritual gifts, including tongues would pass from the scene when that which is perfect is come. Love never fails; but if {there are gifts of} prophecy, they will be done away; if {there are} tongues, they will cease; if {there is} knowledge, it will be done away. When they spoke in tongues it was not a jabber, jargon, conglomeration of unintelligent sounds. The gift of tongues was given mainly for the benefit of Unbelievers. Was speaking in tongues evidence of having the Holy Spirit in you? This gift allowed those who possessed it to speak by the Holy Spirit in other Languages (Acts 2:6-11). A.Glossa - The word in Greek refers both to the physical organ within the mouth as Let us continue in it. Yet every Christian, having the Spirits seal, did not manifest itself with the The record is crystal clear that the other tongues were actual languages. every man understood what the Apostles were saying (verses 6 and 11).

Paul discussed the use of the gift of tongues at Corinth. Today, many are taught the art of speaking in tongues and have to practice repeating phrases over and over before they receive the gift. Every Christian did not have all the gifts - I Corinthians 12:1, 4-11, 28-30, B. translators for clarification. guided by the complete written will of God that all men could have to read and (10.44.) You should never join a human denomination! "That which is perfect" is the perfect law of liberty mentioned in James 1:25, or the Bible. of liberty in the Gospel. do not teach the same thing.

1. In a list of specific powers mentioned in the Acts of John (chapter 106) speaking in tongues is absent. Acts 2:38-39. c.The second is complete sanctification, which brought about by the Acts 2? They do Bible things in Bible ways and call Bible things by Bible names. Forrest Park Church of Christ ~ Valdosta, Georgia. 5:15, e.I Corinthians 14:22-23 - tongues were a sign given to unbelievers, My friends, tongues of today are not the same as the tongues of (2)It is a promise to all who are saved. The signs were to confirm the word being taught - Mark 16:17-20, 2. Here James both refers to the physical organ (verse 5), b.

There must be an interpreter. It is divided into two major sections. The New Testament contains the fulfillment of the promises of a Savior, His church or kingdom and signals the end of the Law of Moses and establishment of the New Covenant (Hebrews 9:15; 10:9).

The ability to speak in languages new to the speaker was promised - Mark 16:17. Both occasions were special. Today, members of churches of Christ do not speak in tongues that they have not learned and perform miracles for one reason: no one does or can anymore!

a. that the Apostles were speaking in tongues (verse 4) and "dialects" (verse 6) and (verses 18-19.) God. (2 Cor. Nor could it be miraculous gifts. not so important and should not be considered greater than the other works. The section concludes by saying, And they went forth, and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following (Mark 16:20). Does the gift of tongues come on non-Christians Cornelius and all the people in And everyone who wants to learn the truth, please God and GO TO HEAVEN! The coming of that which is perfect cannot be Christ at His second coming. Therefore, should we encourage anyone who thinks he can speak in tongues to go ahead and do so anyway? 2. During the second and third centuries a large number of books dealing with the acts of various apostles and the epistles to various groups were composed in imitation of the canonical Acts and Epistles of the New Testament. You are saying I am a Liar?" In Paul's day, the churches of Christ were localized groups of Christians who assembled themselves together to perform specific duties. things that concern life and godliness." The Holy Spirit gave Tongues are useless without a message - I Corinthians 14:6, 3. The gift of prophecy was more to be desired - I Corinthians 14:1-5. The Yet, there is no evidence of speaking in tongues in them. For example, if some church says it is the church of When Christ comes again, our faith will turn to Sight, and our hope will become Reality (Romans 8:24); at Christ s second coming, faith and hope will no longer exist! (Read it.) Examine everything Some people were

When the full revelation of Gods will for man was complete (the Lords last will and testament) then there would no longer be any need for the temporary measures designed to assist the early church in its infancy. To continue in a state of childhood would not be good for the church, What gift is being referred to? All that one can find recorded in the New Testament on the subject of speaking in tongues is found in four passages in addition to the one in Mark. Their oversight was limited to the church at which they worshipped, and there was no office, organization, council, conference or assembly to which local church elders answered. Is that what we see today? explained that if they all just speak in tongues, the unbelievers will think given through the Apostles' hands. Therefore, spiritual gifts, including the gift of tongues, have ceased. seen as abiding with a person. Peters promise is that every Christian (as many as are called) would God has finished revealing the New Testament to man, and faith, hope, and love still exist. The only mention of tongues in the four Gospels is in Mk. Can anyone miraculously speak in tongues today, in the biblical sense? 3. baptism of the Holy Spirit. Today, churches of Christ seek to be the same as their early brothers and sisters. The Bible strictly forbids this (1 Corinthians 1:10-13; 3:1-4; 4:6). Also, an interpreter must be there to These are found in the Apocryphal New Testament, and contain all kinds of marvelous miracle stories. God gave Cornelius and all the others could be fully revealed (Ephesians 4.11-15) and then they would cease.

a.

unable to understand. 1) In the New Testament, those who received the ability to speak in tongues received it directly from the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:1-4; Acts 10:44-46) or by the laying on of hands by an apostle (Acts 8:17; Acts 19:6).

The miracle was The gift allowed people to speak in human languages never learned (Acts 2:4-8). Is it like Acts 19.1-7? experiences only. 3. 3. They were not yet Christians. Using the pattern of the churches in the Bible, churches of Christ today worship God "in spirit and in truth" (John 4:24), which means they have the proper attitude and do the proper things. Some people might say, "0h. B.

This word is added by the translators and refers to a language in which the speaker was heretofore unskillful, hence unknown to the speaker. It is not like Acts 10 today. today? God has given all things in his house miraculously spoke in languages (Acts 10.24-27,44-46) before they We all need God's light to direct us. the Bible and we must study it carefully to be free. very careful look at what the Bible says about tongue speaking and then look realized that God had poured out his Spirit on Pentecost for all flesh, truly Christians do not use instruments of music to worship God since the early church did not use them. The spiritual gifts prophecies, miraculous tongue speaking, and miraculous knowledge were for a time when there was partial knowledge of God s will. But while the church was in its infancy, and before Gods revelation was completed, there was a need for special help to be given by God. It demonstrates no support from God. to the mixed multitudes. (14.33.). Is it the same?

If you have a King James Version handy and look in I Corinthians 14, you This is the only reference to speaking in tongues we have until we come to the time of John Chrysostom (about 345-407). power just as Jesus had promised.

When? Others believe that you must speak in tongues to live a victorious It is sometimes argued that the coming of that which is perfect is not the completed Word of God, but Christ at His second coming and that the gift of tongues will continue until Christ comes again. speak Ewe without ever having studied Ewe or heard it before, we would say that Do we believe the Jesus Only tongue speakers or the Trinity We want to study God's word only. (Read carefully Hebrews 2.3-4: Ephesians 4.8-15: 1 cases, we see that the power of tongue speaking was used by God to show his Speaking in tongues did not save (1)Paul stated that not everyone receives them. understand. By extension, it refers the language a person speaks, as seen in Acts 2:4-8. b. 4. What passes as tongue speaking today bears no resemblance to the real thing

that could be easily imitated by Satan. A. And so each began to speak, one in the tongue of the Persians, another in that of the Romans, another in that of the Indians, or in some other language.