The air enters an inlet which reduces the flow to a thin high-velocity stream of particles. For this reason, care and attention to procedural details must be exercised when performing optical particle counts.

This convention is covered under the ISO standard 4406:99. Dilute viscous fluids and heavily contaminated samples using prefiltered reagent grade kerosene prior to particle counting (remember to recalculate the original particle count concentrations using the appropriate dilution factor). This is done by dividing the raw counts by the product of the sample flowrate multiplied by the sample collection time. Theoretically, optical based instrument is unable to measure the mass concentration of particulate matter which is the key parameter in air quality monitoring. Many machine failures are due to contamination of the oil. Other factors: When estimating mass a number of factors impact this estimation. The density, refractivity, and even the geometry of particles passing through the sensor can impact the mass estimation. As you might imagine a dark, and very dense particulate will have a much lower mass estimation than a less dense and paler particulate even if they are of identical size. Typically the sensor allows the user to apply a correction factor to account for this, that way if the user knows something about their environment (e.g. Welcome to Climet Instruments Company, a division of Venturedyne Ltd. 0%h0PA V-$<8)f`!!f 0['U>kU TFJp?m%m1VXzTEgd\\a7MHVP%(LcW% mV:z>QUmJ"nE

Particle counts that fit the model can be graphically displayed, converted from one counting size-frequency range to another, and extrapolated to estimate counts beyond the measured range. You can argue that outdoor air quality is really homogenous, so doing normalization in that case improves performance. If thats the argument then why not simply download a smartphone app to get the value directly from a reference instrument located nearby and ignore the local sensor entirely?

However, whichever method of reporting is selected, the first step is to count the number of particles in a volume of fluid. To resolve this issue, developers of automatic optical particle counters have devised a compromise known as the equivalent spherical diameter (Figure 2). Can I convert these ISO classes into a NAS cleanliness class? In the previous installments, I discussed ISO21501-4 (a standard used during particle counter calibration for the cleanroom industry) and how it served to bring a degree of rigor to air quality measurements in the cleanroom and manufacturing industry. In this installment, well discuss particle mass (PM) estimation in air quality instrumentation. Its impossible to control the uniformity of a beam of light over a large area within a chamber (in a particle counter the alignment is critical to within a few microns!). Learn More , COVER FOR USE WITH MS90362 EXTERNAL POWER RECEPTACLE, Exploration of Discrete Element Method to Dynamically Model Sandy Terrain, Modeling CO2 Concentrations in Vehicle Cabin.

Required fields are marked *. The estimated mass for each channel coupled with the previously determined concentrations for each channel allows us to then estimate total mass by channel and then to group various channel masses to form more common mass measurements like PM2.5 etc. In the previous installments, I discussed ISO21501-4 (a standard used during particle counter calibration for the cleanroom industry) and how it served to bring a , In the previous installment I provided a brief history of air quality in the cleanroom space. Therefore, there is a need for a thorough evaluation on the particle to mass conversion factor in order to improve the accuracy of the reported mass concentrations by an optical instrument. Want to participate in updating this standard? If the counts are cumulative then the particle counts used in the comparison must use the cumulative counts from the same size channels.

Although the most common standard, ISO 4406:99, is not the only method by which the cleanliness of an oil sample can be reported. The Index is then incremented to the next array element (#4). For many who are considering setting up their own onsite oil analysis program, the first question they ask is What instrument should I purchase first? While there are many fine onsite instruments available in the oil analysis marketplace, there can be little doubt that the ability to quantify an oils fluid cleanliness using particle counting is the most valuable tool in any proactive maintenance program. The amplitude (or height) of that voltage pulse is indicative of the particle size.

Test for free and emulsified water using a crackle test or other moisture screening method. Filed Under: Cleanroom Classification Qualification, Cleanroom Monitoring, Particle Knowledge Tagged With: aerosol, conversion, convert data, formula, normalized, particle counter, raw data, Corporate Headquarters

With the equivalent spherical diameter method, a particle is counted in the size-range under which the shadow, or scattering effect observed would have appeared, if the particle had been a perfect sphere. In this procedure, the particles are manually counted, which can then be used to determine the fluid cleanliness of the bulk sample. One instrument measures the flow decay across the membrane as it becomes plugged while pressure is held constant, first with particles greater than 10 microns, and later by smaller particles as the larger particles plug the screen. Laser optical particle counters are generally considered to be slightly more accurate and sensitive than white light instruments. The air passes through the chamber, some of it passing through a beam of light within the chamber.

normalize your counts to a full cubic meter, which can then In some of these cases, these algorithms rely on a reference instrument located in that geographical area to provide the bulk of the reading and then slightly altering that reading based on the local sensor reading. The words sound good in a sales talk perhaps, with words like normalization and post-processing in the cloud lending an air of sophistication and technology to the offering. But, if we look at whats actually being done it becomes less much less appealing. Who would stand for the temperature sensor in their home going out to the cloud to ask what temperature other sensors in the neighborhood thought it was and then adding or subtracting a bit from that value based on the local sensor to arrive at an estimate for the local temperature? There are two instrument-types that use this method.

All rights reserved.

The purpose of this article isnt to run down particular companies or products, as youve likely noted I havent mentioned any company by name. To date weve had in-depth discussions with most of the companies offering products in this space globally. Nearly all of them are well-intentioned and trying to do the best they can for their clients with what they have. Most are eager to hear about and evaluate new technology with an eye to improving their products for their clients.

some dust is added and blown around by fans) and a large number of sensors are connected to the chamber with the reference instrument. The value on the reference instrument is then used to calibrate all of the sensors, based on the value they are currently seeing. In such a system its doubtful that repeating the process with a sensor would yield the same or similar calibration value. Other factors: As with the particle counter the same external factors: particle density, refractivity, geometry affect the conversion of scattered light into an estimate of particle mass (i.e. For example, both air bubbles, and free and emulsified water appear as if they are a particle using the optical particle counting method. Normalized Counts (#/vol) = Raw Counts / [Sample Time (Time) X Volumetric Flowrate Volume/Time)]. While pore block particle counters do not suffer the same problems as optical particle counters with respect to false positive caused by air, water, dark fluid, etc., they do not have the same dynamic range as an optical particle counter, and because the particle size distribution is roughly estimated, are dependent on the accuracy of the algorithm to accurately report ISO fluid cleanliness codes according to ISO 4406:99. See below. The application of optical based instrument in particulate matter monitoring has gained interest among researchers in recent years due to their high degree automation in providing real time reading of particulate matter concentrations. be easily compared to regulatory standards such as ISO Sensor electronics bin these pulses by size into separate channels, and keep a count of pulses in each channel. action and alert levels. The drop in voltage produced by the photocell is directly proportional to the size of the shadow and hence the size of the particle passing through. if the sensor is measuring particles different than the ones it was calibrated with, well get different values for estimated mass). And, typically many of these sensors have no means for adding a correction factor. Also, the same issue applies for relative humidity and again there is seldom an option of adding a means of controlling humidity with these sensors. In the case of an indicationwith 2 numbers, such as "15/12", the smallest ISO size class is not taken into account because, for example, the particles were counted optically using a microscope. The sad truth of optical photometry in air quality products. Once the array is full (Count reaches 36), the accumulation operation starts following the diagram shown below. Nevertheless, they accurately report the aggregate concentration of particulates in the oil, and in certain situations, particularly dark fluids such as diesel engine oils and other heavily contaminated oils, pore block particle counting does offer advantages. This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) describes a mathematical model that can be used to analyze particle count data. de:Z"TpwT@M@MY$&xvyx-L//oP~8q{1I )ppEL"VF~ zjg!DXvwhr+inBiPYP*aHfwJ4|gB~!x'4i`4=K%xM5wqmSaDrq\x7fQ.>abWrzxy0 However, with kit 2 you provide me with cleanliness classes according to ISO. Particle count data is an invaluable part of any proactive condition-monitoring program, from ensuring that abrasive bearing wear is minimized, to determining if a hydraulic fluid is clean enough for reliable operation.

So, how did we get here? Well, as we saw in previous installments, air quality measurement arose out of a need to control manufacturing environments in the cleanroom space. The companies that served this market created sophisticated instruments to measure in many cases handfuls of tiny particulates. Over time these grew to be rather complex and expensive instruments. Finally, its clear from multiple papers that PM measurements only tell a small part of the story and that size distribution, particularly vis--vis ultra-fine particles, is increasingly critical in safe-guarding health and well-being. If were to address to provide a means of characterizing air quality to reflect this reality its clear well have to modify or extend what were currently doing to encapsulate this information. If the above is the case, then how do these sensors perform so well in the field? It doesnt seem like it would be possible for so many of the sensors scattered across a geographical area to agree on air quality if the above were the case. The above perplexed me some as well, and the reality of what has become common-place for low-cost sensors in this industry is quite shocking. Below are some of the methods these sensors use to attempt to improve their measurement accuracy. Air Quality Instrumentation: Part III Particle Mass (PM) Estimation, Air Quality Instrumentation Part II: A Manufacturing Standard. Notice, Smithsonian Terms of The Index identifies which of the 36 array elements will receive the next count information from the particle counter. The velocity gradient mentioned above and the geometry of the chamber creates eddies within the air flow so that some of the particles will recirculate through the chamber and get counted multiple times. To make matters worse, these eddies are much slower and so these particles will scatter much more light on subsequent passes than they do on their initial pass through the beam. Some particle counters we have the means to exclude these from being counted, but there is no such mechanism possible in a photometer. Normalization and post-processing in the cloud. This would be a much more transparent, and likely a more accurate, implementation. And, its not even worth discussing how poorly such a system works for indoor air quality measurement. This allows the average fluid cleanliness to be estimated, permitting the ISO code to be trended over subsequent samples. This article, by Particles Plus, Inc.s Chief Technology Officer Davis Pariseau, originally appeared in the March 2019 issue of Healthy Indoorsmagazine. Welcome to the leading manufacturer If more than a few minutes pass between sampling and testing, resuspend the particles by agitating the sample for five minutes (longer for viscous fluids) in a paint shaker. Agreement NNX16AC86A, Is ADS down? "NAS 9". Want to read more about particle count conversion? There are three basic methods that can be used to determine the absolute number of particles in any given sample. Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Just like a white light instrument, the change in voltage across the photocell is directly related to the size of the particle. }8 Fpp Astrophysical Observatory. This was chosen to be conservative and provide a worst-case output.) in an effort to better control the size distribution of particles they are measuring. But, its a crude tool at best and doesnt provide any size distribution for the particles you are measuring, and none of the low-cost photometers have even this rudimentary ability. There are no size bins the reading is the aggregate of the total scattered light over some sample But, a handful of smaller particles in the beam can scatter a similar amount of light as one larger particle, but as we saw in the table above the mass estimation difference between smaller and larger particles (since mass is the cube of the size) is enormous, so its impossible to get a good mass estimation without having some idea of the size distribution. The most expensive photometers have either manual or automated means of excluding larger particles from the air stream (e.g. vm$iGkG6H QHbEq.If7j34z|DXJk|$C(d+cOd^# &$m'XwZk12iv1zK2 l%,(zGK&ehZWC9d( y="!%H^l_Q'N_rFB. OELCHECK can determine the purity class according to both ISO 4406 and SAE 4059 and determines the purity classes for mineral and biodegradable hydraulic oils, among others, starting with analysis kit 2. 5475 Airport Blvd.

F. +1 303-440-1090 David was the original founder of Lighthouse Associates (now known as Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions) in 1985, Technology Plus in 1995 and SinoEV Technologies in 2009. He co-founded Particles Plus in 2010 which is focused on bringing quality products into the mainstream commercial air quality monitoring space. He can be reached at dpariseau@particlesplus.com. Coincident particulates: ISO21501-4 requires manufacturers to state the maximum concentration the sensor can operate in given minimal coincidence (i.e. Instead, the mass concentration is calculated based on particle size distribution under assumptions that all particles is spherical using a known density. gypsum production plant vs. a coal mine) they can take gravimetric samples and add the correction to the sensor to account for such a variation (if this is desired). High relative humidity can also have an effect on particulates. They can act like seeds and absorb moisture growing in apparent size within a sensor. This is more pronounced outdoors in high-humidity environments. In such environments, heaters can be installed on the inlet to attempt to remove the moisture from the incoming air stream in an attempt to improve sensor accuracy. The importance of clean oil cannot be over emphasized. Airflow velocity is important in particle counters since the amount of scattered light is directly related to the speed of the particle passing through the beam and the beams intensity. There are a variety of instruments commercially available to optically count particles; from portable units for onsite use that cost as little as $15,000, to large, sophisticated lab-based instruments that may cost in excess of $40,000. Use, Smithsonian First, for the most part, particles from used oil samples are not perfectly spherical. Periodically these channels are read and reported, indicating particulate counts by size over a user-defined sample period. These channels are configured during a calibration process where particles of known sizes are used to establish the pulse height threshold for each channel. In these sensors, because of the design of the chamber there is a large velocity gradient to the air moving through the chamber. Like a river where the water in the center of the stream is typically moving much faster than the water along the banks, the air in the center of the chamber is moving much faster than the air along the walls. So, slower particles passing through the beam will scatter more light than faster particles of the same size. In this study, the reported mass concentration from an optical based instrument as a function of particle distribution through random air sampling was investigated. _], tfY:(*SvFkvBkYRdc*~LfnTQB7gFr>0j%aj[a%ec2EtTK3@JV 9tp of high quality cleanroom environmental monitoring Thats a pretty long time between updates. With the NAS 1638, an NAS number (0 to 12) is determined for each of the 5 counting ranges. To estimate particle mass, average size is attributed to each channel and then that size is used along with estimates for particle density and refractivity to determine an estimated mass for one particle within a channel. Counts # / ft3 x [0.035 ft3/L] = Counts # / L. The reported size channels being compared must be considered when performing comparison analysis between counters. This edition of Oil Analysis 101 focuses on particle counting and related standards.

Airflow laminarity (a measure of how linear the airflow is between the inlet and outlet) is important as well. Dont leave your onsite particle counter idle on the shelf - make the most of this valuable asset each and every day. The ADS is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory under NASA Cooperative Thank you. In a laser-based instrument, due to the near-parallel nature of the laser beam, light scattering from the unimpeded laser beam is minimal because it is focused into a beam stop - until a particle passes through the instrument. Your email address will not be published. Particle counting was introduced during the 1970s as a result of the pioneering work on hydraulics and fluid power, conducted at Oklahoma State University by Dr. E. C. Fitch, father of Norias founder and president Jim Fitch, and coworkers. As the next cubic foot measurement is received from the particle counter, it is stored in the array according to the Index and added to the Sum value (operations #1 and #2). August 5, 2016 | in SmartScan | by Tejinder Singh. How did we get here and where do we go from here. Ensure that the effects due to air bubbles are negated by using vacuum ultrasonic bath and/or a vacuum de-greasing - preferably both, starting with the ultrasonic bath (optical particle counters).