My ISO remains at 2500 while shooting in Aperture priority, but the problem is that reducing the ISO affects the focus of the action and lighting. Having no zoom is certainly a challenge so itd definitely be about waiting for the play to come to a specific point on the ice. The more precise you get with your focus points, the more precise you will need to be as a photographer when it comes to tracking the action. Normally I hate saying that the camera is a factor, but this is the one exception where a better camera really does help! You have to remember that the pictures you shoot depends on the glass (lens) you are using. At an old hockey arena with outdated, flickering lights, however, youll get a lot of shots tinted with too much yellow, blue or green. You can see that the majority of images shot in this article are at ISO 2000 on a full frame camera. The wide aperture also collects lots of light so we can keep the shutter speed high enough to capture the action in front of the net. The challenge with relying on all of these focus points at the same time is that your camera wont necessarily focus exactly on what you wanted it to. Would purchasing the Canon EOS T3i instead improve action shots, or would I need to move further up in quality? Taking pictures through these walls results in flares and reflections. Feedback on how the camera works in these conditions would be helpful. During the winter months I take a lot of indoor soccer photos in low light conditions. Monopods can be a hindrance because it changes your ability to pivot as you follow action. Let us know what you decide on and good luck. Its a balancing act and nobody likes making compromises, but unless you have the option to add a whole lot more lighting to the arena then you have to deal with what youve got. Plus, Nikon has the 35mm f/1.8 lens for $200.

I'm certainly no expert, so you could probably do better than this if you were up to it. White balance on your camera is shown in Kelvin, with numbers on a sliding scale like 3200, 6000, 7800. Your exposure is locked and your focus is set. It can be a real challenge to deal with mixed lighting but that just makes it extra rewarding when you get the celebration shot!1/500, 3.2, ISO 2000. My first camera for shooting hockey was very comparable to the Rebel T7 and together with a 50mm 1.8 lens I feel like I still managed to get some great shots and learn a lot about hockey photography! What are the best camera settings for hockey photography? Even then, you'll be working at ISO 3200 or ISO 6400. Ive heard really good things though about mirrorless and the speed at which technology is increasing makes me want to move towards mirrorless sooner rather than later. My budget is pretty good. I have the Canon R5, RF50 1.2 & the RF800. Glass removes a lot of contrast from an image, so adding that punch back into the picture helps a lot. If you havent already seen it, Id recommend checking out my article about focus: https://frankmyrland.com/hockey-photography-guide-focus/. For many events in life, Auto White Balance does an admirable job. Heres what were going to talk about in this article: Shoot RAWHow to build your shotShutter SpeedApertureISOMaking CompromisesFocusBack Button FocusWhite BalanceShoot! Hope this clears thing up. The next cheapest step is to combine the purchase of a Nikon D7000 to D5100 with the appropriate Nikon 85mm f/1.8 lens - the D7000 & D5100 have about 1 stop better high ISO performance than the Canon sensors if I remember correctly. I didn't want to use flash to avoid distractions, so I had to make do with the fairly miserable ambient light. If you have the opportunity, before committing to a lens would you be able to take some pics in an arena at f4.5 with an acceptable shutter speed for motion and see how it looks?

No need to fiddle with settings every 5 minutes during the game. Light is light, regardless of camera, so I almost wonder if there is a camera setting turned on somewhere? Every picture a camera takes depends on three settings: Shutter Speed, Aperture and ISO. Everything Ive read says the R5 handles ISO with ease but Ive never shot an indoor hockey event.

With a bit of luck you might be able to find a perfectly capable lens with some big savings. The problem Im running into is my settings, more specifically I believe my ISO. How does Laowa's latest full-frame lens perform? Ultimately, there isnt usually much flexibility with aperture at a hockey rink. It can be a bit confusing so Ill try to break it down. Is this the gimbal to get? In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media. Youre up against low light and fast action. If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our. If Im in an arena with glass that has lots of marks, Ill still try to find a little spot that is clear. The higher the number, the brighter the picture but at the cost of more noise and lower picture quality. What I am struggling with is the position to take the photos: Around the field you typically have glas walls which are dirty or damaged. Personally I prefer a higher ISO in order to keep the exposure near where I want it to be since brighting images in post will introduce more grain into the shot as well. If they havent replaced the glass for a while, you just might not have the option. Would a nifty fifty (or 50mm f/1.4) fit the bill? Remember back when I was talking about RAW?

This shot uses an ISO of 2000, which helps collect as much light as possible from the dimly lit arena. Your Guide to Hitting Your Focus for Hockey Photography Read more in the Hockey Photography Series: Introduction Aperture Shutter Speed ISO FocusWhat Lens to UseHitting your focus is quite possible the hardest part of hockey photography. Its a full frame camera, so you can expect great quality and solid performance, even in low light, despite being an older model. Alright, youve got your exposure figured out. Now youre going to need to position yourself so you are in the right places to capture the action, and learn how to anticipate the big moments so that you dont miss a moment. In Addition, behind the goals you have protective nets above the glas walls preventing injured spectators but also making this interesting perspective impossible for photography. Also, if you want to use blur creatively to show the speed of the game, you can also slow down the shutter speed and try using panning techniques to give a cool sense of the speed. Is it worth to buy so old camera for a beginner in your opinion? Happy that the camera supports RAW photos, however I want those photos to be good quality to catch those high pace games, This is the right link: https://www.amazon.ca/Canon-EOS-2000D-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B08KSH2LQW/ref=sr_1_18?keywords=rebel+t7&qid=1639455404&sr=8-18. For sports you need more fps than the T3 has and you need a large buffer so that when you take 20 or so shots in a row that it will continue to keep taking pictures. Lots of options, but a full-frame camera and a 70-200 is the best place to start! But the only way you can lower the ISO is if you slow down the shutter speed (which may make the pictures blurry) or if you widen up the aperture, which leads to the second possible issue: focus. If you can't afford a new one, then there are plenty of used 7D's out there for a fraction of what they cost new. Were going to get into how we can use our aperture and ISO to counterbalance a fast shutter speed, but its important to be aware of this when choosing a shutter speed. Your Guide to using ISO for Hockey Photography Read more in the Hockey Photography Series: Introduction Aperture Shutter Speed ISO FocusWhat Lens to UseISO is an important piece in the puzzle to brings your final exposure together. But, the next best thing I have is EF 70-200 f4 or EF 200mm f2.8. We dive deep to find out where it excels and what it's like to fly.

In the end, if you're happy with the quality produced by your friend's kit you know duplicating that kit can produce same level of quality. Well, if you took that advice and made the switch then this section wont be as important. Then I think you're right, either you need a 2-body setup with a couple of fast primes (50mm & 100mm ?) The Canon T7 should work well as a starter camera if paired with a wide aperture lens like the 50mm 1.8. But is it enough to outclass the competition? Wonderful article! Great advice. That sony sensor really outperforms the canon sensors at those ISOs. That's what makes the OPs situation so difficult. Your Guide to Improving Your Hockey Photography Read more in the Hockey Photography Series: Introduction Aperture Shutter Speed ISO FocusWhat Lens to UseHockey is a fun and fast sport, but it can also be incredibly challenging to photograph. Really appreciate the feedback Frank! Usually its best to aim for an aperture around 2.8, to collect a lot of light, and then see if the pictures you take are in focus. For indoor soccer, what is, in your opinion, the "right lens"?

The photos turned out pretty well, but the colors were extremely dull and muted.

These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. It requires more tele and most of the time you do not see the faces of the players because they look rather downwards than up into the camera. The focus and everything looks good, I just want to know how to fix the colors. I would caution regarding the monopod advice. Creating Your Own Luck on the StreetStreet photography is both exhilarating and nerve-inducing in equal measure. The lower the number, the wider the aperture and the brighter the picture. I just need a newer/faster version. High ISOs are a necessary evil in most poorly lit arenas or else you would end up with a blurry shot. A dynamic, interesting, well-composed picture with some grain beats a forgettable picture without grain every day of the week in my book . I currently have an old Canon Rebel EOS about 10+ years old that needs replacing. on a monopod. When I take hockey photos, heres how I prioritize these Big Three settings: Lets take a deep dive into each to see what we need to consider for each of these settings as we flip our camera over to Manual. You could have shot landscapes for 40 years but if you don't shoot low light sports or something very similar your experience isn't relevant to the OPs needs. Shooting in RAW gives you greater ability to edit exposure and white balance after the fact. If you are shooting through scuffed up glass full of puck marks, it pretty much doesnt matter what your camera settings are .. the colours and contrast are going to come out very dull. A lot of folks on this site buy refurbished and are very satisfied.Rich. Can you ask your friend what camera model and lens she was using? Certainly I would say the 70-200 if hockey is priority, but you have the right idea about thinking of how you might use the lens for other situations. We talked primarily about the drawbacks of the crop sensor when it comes to reducing zoom, but I do feel the need to mention that the benefits are quite considerable as well. It also depends if this sort of lens blends with the other types of photography you do away from the ice. Your current camera has a APS-C sensor with a crop factor of 1.6. Theres no hard and fast rule on what shutter speed you should select; it depends entirely on how fast the game is. Neither lens will work great for hockey. if it was me I would look at a t2i/550d its a bit cheaper and so leave you extra cash for a lens.

But when youre shooting in a demanding environment like a hockey arena, youre going to want to keep all that data. The more I read the more confused I get. BUT, having been involved in a lot of sports forums for the last 5 years I've seen work from others who have. By correcting RAW images later or by taking time to select the right white balance in camera when shooting JPG we can make sure that the final shot looks like it did in real life. 1/400, f2, ISO 800 - w/some natural light.I am typically happy with these results, 1/200, f2, ISO 800 - no natural light..very few keepers and those that I do, I am not thrilled with, to distracted mom I am not getting into which camera is better I have already said that they will all do the job. Using an aperture of 3.2 for this shot blurs the faces in the crowd so they dont distract from focal point of the image. Personally, and I'm a Canon guy, I think the nikon d7000 is a better option than any of the canons below the 7d. You don't get every shot with the nifty fifty, but those you do get are pretty good. It could be that Im still adjusting to a new camera or maybe that I havent figured out editing entirely, but even after applying my usual edits in Camera RAW my pictures look nothing like yours even with a lower ISO. On your camera aperture is displayed with numbers like 2.8, 5.6 or 8. Last season I was able to get away with a shutter speed of 1/640, an ISO of either 640 or 800 depending on the game, and using a 50mm lens with an f-stop usually at 2.2 or 2.5. But it also didnt look the most vibrant in real life, so part of it may have been the rink lighting, but in your example photos the colors are crisp and clear, and I wanted to know how you got them like that. If you want to invest a bit more, you could also take a look at the 24-70 2.8. The lower the number, the more blue the picture will be. Hi IMHO the op asked if a t3i/600d would do the job and the it will do it with the right lens and that goes for a 7d or a nikon. This is important for moving subjects. Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. Both pics have about 50% cropped out. So without further ado, lets go to the next important step in choosing the right camera settings for hockey. Though rink lighting doesnt usually give much wiggle room, my first recommendation would be to bring your shutter speed down a bit to 1/500 and, if possible, bring down your f-stop/aperture a bit too. This might cause you to miss shots in a fast paced game like basketball. It sounds to me like the high ISO is the culprit here. My favourite place to shoot from is the corners just like you mentioned this is the best place to be able to see faces. As demonstrated in our article What are the benefits of commercial photography for your small business?How do you quickly grab a potential customers attention? Thank you everyone. If you have any questions, simply let me know in the comments! Nikon has announced the Z30, an entry-level Z-mount camera aimed at vloggers and other content creators. Ive found more success in waiting for a play to develop into specific areas of the ice that are sweet spots based on my lens. Hi Garry! Cheers! Without getting silly about expenses, a T3i is as good as you can get, and had the advantage of a tilty screen, which us very useful for little movies with the camera held steady. So when you buy your new camera, buying a faster lens is a good idea. I recently took advantage of a rather fine day recently to get an action shot out on the pond. Capturing real people, as unpredictable and varied as they are, can offer huge challenges and wonderful rewards. Which method of describing sensor size do you find easiest to understand? That way, I can push the ISO up to 3200 or so, and shoot at around f2. The good news is that with just a little bit of planning you can quickly learn to set up your camera in manual mode and make the most of your time at rink. Unless youre photographing a game with kids who are still learning to skate, youre going to need a fast shutter speed to freeze the action. All brand makes this lens or a close variant of it. Its one of the best options for crop sensors or full frame sensor cameras alike so no need to go shopping for a new lens just yet! I am forced to use the (good) kit lens 18-55. In addition to this, your camera focuses using many different focus points the amount varies depending on what kind of camera you have. What are the benefits of commercial photography for your small business? Wanted to ask for a camera for Christmas and saw some good deals on Canon EOS Rebel T7, and it comes in a bundle with a ton of stuff. The other obstacle you will have to overcome for sports photography is frames per second, T3i is rated at 3.7fps. Again, all brands will make a lens like this or a close variant. Hi! Youre very limited with what you can edit with a JPG before the image starts losing quality and looking unnatural. I am a beginner and fell in love with photography during an art class and want to do photography for my buddies AAA hockey team, and also a ton of other things. Fairly useless for indoor soccer if you want something better than snapshot quality. The zoom is too slow and the prime is too long. The first lens you would want to get for hockey-specific photos would be the 70-200 f2.8. Multiply by 1.6 means you are actually at 320mm on a full frame camera. Quality is a very subjective thing. The important thing to note here is that the faster the shutter speed, the darker the picture. Use your camera manual to find out how to switch to back button focus and give it a try! This gives a full frame photographer a lot of more to work with compared to a crop sensor photographer in the same lighting conditions. I cant say that I have direct experience with that camera or much of the Nikon lineup. The drawback is that RAW files are much larger, often double or even triple the size of a JPG. I was positioned on the bench with no glass to shoot through, so I expected my images to be so much clearer than they are. This means the camera sensor size is larger, which is much better for getting great shots in low light conditions. or you need a D5100 or D7000 with a 70-200 f/2.8 (pick up a old non-VC version of course for this.) The more I read about the loss of zoom (particularly for hockey), the more I think I should stick with a crop sensor. To start with, here's the final shot How to take a dramatic hockey portrait Read more in the Hockey Photography Series:Its not every day you get to play with flashes at a hockey rink. Lenses all have different maximum apertures. It is expressed in numbers like 200, 800 and 1600. The amount of grain that is acceptable for a final image also depends on personal preference, but also on how and where you are sharing the images. Do you know what lens I could buy (budget) to improve the camera for Minor hockey (they play BB Bantam so quite fast but not NHL speed!). Out of pure frustration, I've been rethinking my set up as well - T1i w/Sigma 50mm 1.4. On a Full Frame I can go to 3200 or sometimes even higher while still getting results worth keeping. The older the camera, the more pictures will start to break down at high ISOs. In the NHL they have the luxury of being able to remove a small covering and shoot through the glass. But if you dont have that luxury, you simply have to manage with what you can. In taking pictures last weekend, my friend was using one of her Canon's which had an ISO up to 6400. Ive always felt you get what u pay for any suggestions on cameras and lens for a beginner. (Thats just a complicated way to say that the sensor is smaller than the sensors using on a full frame camera.). Unfortunately, the quality of the glass and the puck marks do vary quite a bit from arena to arena. Without a doubt, indoor soccer seems to have some of the WORST lighting there is -assuming we're talking amateur / youth soccer here. Many thanks for the reply Frank! Whats the practical application of this? Thats an interesting question. Regardless of which brand you go with (Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc. The camera store expert suggested a Canon EOS RP (and Im looking at the EOS R), but hes saying my zoom will decrease to closer to 200 mm when I switch to full frame.